Connect with us

Business

Is Germany at risk of repeating its dark history?

Published

on

Is Germany at risk of repeating its dark history?

“Worried”, “nervous” and even “terrified” were some of the words used by our readers to describe how they felt about the results of Germany’s recent federal election in which the far right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party got the second most votes (around 20 percent), marking the highest post-war score for a far-right party.

Concerned citizens and immigrants have voiced serious warnings against the AfD for years – indeed party members have given critics a lot to be concerned about. From joining a secret meeting to discuss mass-deportations, to using Nazi slogans and criticising Holocaust remembrance, if you are looking for evidence that AfD members may be following in the footsteps of the National Socialists (Nazis), there’s plenty to be suspicious about.

But whether or not Germany is really at risk of repeating its darkest chapter is more difficult to unpack. It’s true that there are similarities between Germany’s current political climate, and that of say around 100 years ago. But it’s also true that the country’s Basic Law has stronger protections for Democracy now, and that the tradition of Holocaust remembrance is still strong.

With that in mind, The Local spoke to historian and Director of the Topography of Terror Foundation in Berlin, Dr. Andrea Riedle, about the recent rise of fascist politics in Germany (and elsewhere) and to what extent it mirrors that seen in the lead-up to the Holocaust.

Fascism in the 1930s and 40s as compared to today

Asked if Riedle saw similarities between what was happening when the Nazis rose to power and the current political environment, she began by noting a distinction between fascism broadly and National Socialism that took power in Germany in the 1930s and 40s.

While fascism – which was observed in Italy around the Second World War as well as a number of other countries since then – comes with devastating consequences for many people, Riedle said that “National Socialism was far more radical…and, with the murder of European Jews in the 1940s, pursued the extermination of an entire population group”.

She added: “When using the term ‘fascism’ in relation to today’s political phenomena, there is a danger of trivialising these historical crimes.”

That said, there are legitimate similarities between the tactics far-right parties – including the AfD, or US President Donald Trump’s MAGA movement in the US – are using and those that the Nazis used to gain influence.

A demonstrator holds up a placard showing Thuringia’s AfD leader Bjoern Hoecke giving the Nazi salute and reading “Never Again” as activists from different groups demonstrate against right extremism and the policy of Germany’s far-right the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party in front of the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin. Photo by Adam BERRY / AFP

“Certain mechanisms that worked back then can be observed again today,” Riedle says, adding that leaders of these parties “work with hate, agitation and disinformation, while facts often play no role”.

The historian notes the degradation of minorities, the announcement of mass deportations, the contempt for women’s rights and members of the LGBTQ community, and even the denial of man-made climate change are all clear examples of ideas that fit within the Nazi ideology.

READ ALSO: ‘A fifth of voters hate me’ – How do foreigners in Germany feel about far-right surge?

Advertisement

‘A massive political shift’

Looking outside Germany, experts note that there has been a political change that is leaving many worried that fascism is emerging in other the western democracies. 

Billionaire Elon Musk, who’s become a highly involved supporter of both Donald Trump and the AfD, was seen giving what appeared to many to be a Nazi salute on stage at Trump’s inauguration in January.

READ ALSO: What are the rules around showing the Nazi salute in Germany?

Asked about her reaction to the gesture, Riedle said: “It can be assumed that he knew exactly what he was doing.

“For me, the Nazi associations that go with it are hard to bear. And you have to imagine what this image must have looked like to Holocaust survivors.”

steve bannon

Steve Bannon, media personality and political strategist, speaks during the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) on February 20, 2025 in Oxon Hill, Maryland. Bannon was accused of doing a straight-arm Nazi salute (not depicted) at the end of his speech, but claimed it was ‘just a wave’. Photo by Andrew Harnik / GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA / Getty Images via AFP

Since then, other members of Trump’s MAGA movement have also allegedly made the gesture at public events, including Steve Bannon who served as Trump’s chief strategist during his 2016 campaign.

The Anti-Defamation League, an antisemitism and human rights watchdog, wrote on X that Steve Bannon has a “long and disturbing history of stoking antisemitism and hate, threatening violence and empowering extremists…”

READ ALSO: Where in Europe is the hard right on the rise?

Given the alleged use of Nazi gestures by some party members, and their efforts to ramp up mass deportations of immigrants as well as attack women’s and LGBTQ rights, some have suggested that the US Republican party (GOP) under Trump’s leadership has become a neo-Nazi party. In fact, some reports suggested as much as far back as 2017.

Advertisement

Riedle points out that although some people may see some similarities between Trump and Hitler as leaders, “there are many differences”. 

“Nevertheless, the dangers that Donald Trump poses should not be underestimated,” she adds.

“Incidentally, I don’t think it’s worrying that there are people like Donald Trump. What is worrying is that he is being put forward as a candidate by an established, conservative party. That is a massive political shift.”

Democracy requires constant vigilance

Overall, Riedel’s perspective suggests that no, we don’t need to freak out that Germany is hurdling toward another fascist uprising like that of the Nazis – but yes, there is legitimate cause for concern.

“The situation today is not identical to the situation back then,” Riedel says. “The democratic Weimar Republic had many enemies and was far less socially anchored than the Federal Republic of Germany is today…The difficult economic situation after the crisis of 1929 and the high unemployment in the 1930s cannot be compared with the situation today either – despite all the problems we currently have.”

Advertisement

But what is strikingly similar is that right-wing populist politicians continue to work toward democratic upheaval.

“The National Socialists also pursued a legal course after the failure of their attempted coup in November 1923 – in other words, they tried to come to power through democratic elections. But democracy was only a means to an end for them. As soon as they had political power they abolished basic rights such as freedom of opinion, freedom of the press and freedom of assembly and established a dictatorship.”

Recent comments by Trump, calling for an end to term limits for US presidents or referring to himself as “king” fit this pattern. AfD leaders haven’t made statements to the same degree, but the party’s anti-EU and anti-euro stance show that it would like to steer Germany away from Europe’s biggest democratic institutions.

Riedel reminds us that Hitler succeeded in grabbing power because “the dangers he posed were not taken seriously enough”.

FACT CHECK: The false claims made during AfD’s chat with Musk ahead of election

Advertisement

She adds: “Reich President Hindenburg, who was in favour of a government of united right-wing forces should not have appointed Adolf Hitler as Reich Chancellor in January 1933.”

Riedel adds that in the beginning, only two out of 13 members of Hitler’s cabinet were National Socialists, and other ministers thought they would be able to hold him back.

“The fatal misjudgement of Franz von Papen, the Reich Chancellor’s deputy, was thinking: ‘In two months, we will have pushed Hitler into a corner so that he squeaks.’”

For now, the far right in Germany has been relegated to a position of opposition with no leading decision making power, thanks largely to the centrist parties’ adherence to the ‘firewall’ (Brandmauer).

But with support for the AfD having doubled since the last federal election, and with Merz having recently led the centre-right Union parties to vote with the AfD on migration aimed at tightening migration rules all eyes will be on how the situation develops until the next German election in 2029.

READ ALSO: What protection does Germany have against future dictatorships?

Business

Which European countries currently have Schengen border checks in place?

Published

on

By

Which European countries currently have Schengen border checks in place?

The borderless Schengen travel area recently celebrated its 40th anniversary but many countries currently have border checks reinstated. Here’s what travellers should expect.

The borderless Schengen area guarantees free movement to tens of millions of EU citizens, residents and visitors.

It recently celebrated its 40th anniversary, and after originally starting with just five countries signing a convention pledging to “gradually abolish” internal borders checks and allow people to travel around freely, today the Schengen area includes 25 of the 27 EU member states and the four countries of the European Free Trade Association (Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland).

According to the EU Council website, the Schengen area covers over 4.5 million square kilometres with a total population of almost 450 million people. Every day around 3.5 million people cross the Schengen internal borders for work, study or visits, and almost 1.7 million people reside in one Schengen country while working in another.

Under the Schengen Borders Code, which sets the rules governing the Schengen area, internal border checks can be temporarily restored where there is a “serious threat to public policy or internal security”, from the organisation of a major sport event to a terrorist attack.

These checks should be a “last resort” measure, should be limited to the period “strictly necessary” to respond to the threat and not last more than 6 months. In exceptional circumstances, internal border controls can be reintroduced for a maximum of two years.

Several members of the bloc have reintroduced temporary border controls in recent years. The full list of countries that currently have controls in place is available here.

READ ALSO: Schengen hits 40 – What problems lie ahead for Europe’s border-free zone?

Advertisement

According to European Commission information, the following European countries have reintroduced temporary border checks for the following dates:

  • Spain – 27/06/2025 – 05/07/2025 – IV United National International Conference on Financing for Development in Sevilla (30 June – 3 July 2025); land borders with France and Portugal, internal air borders of Alicante, Almería, Barcelona, Bilbao, Girona, Granada, Madrid, Málaga, Murcia, Sevilla and Valencia; internal maritime borders of Barcelona, Málaga and Palma de Mallorca.

 

  • Italy – 19/06/2025 – 18/12/2025 – Continued threat of terrorist infiltrations into migratory flows along the Western Balkan route, ongoing crises in the Middle East and Ukraine, high level of irregular migration including a strong presence of criminal smuggling and trafficking networks, and heightened security risks associated with the Universal Jubilee of the Catholic Church; land borders with Slovenia.
  • Italy – 19/12/2024 – 18/06/2025 – Continued threat of terrorist infiltrations into migratory flows along the Mediterranean route and the Balkan route, ongoing crises in Eastern Europe and the Middle East, increasing migratory pressures and the risk of terrorist infiltration, risk of violent actions against Israeli citizens and terrorist activity, and heightened security risks associated with the Universal Jubilee of the Catholic Church; land borders with Slovenia.

 

  • Austria – 12/05/2025 – 11/11/2025 – Threats associated with the continued high levels of irregular migration and migrant smuggling across Austria’s southern borders, as well as the strain on the asylum reception system and basic services, Russia’s ongoing war of aggression against Ukraine and the security situation in the Middle East, intensifying the threat posed by Islamist extremism and terrorism; land borders with Hungary and Slovenia.
  • Austria – 16/04/2025 – 15/10/2025 – Threats associated with irregular migration, such as via the Balkan routes (including expected migratory pressure), as well as the strain on the asylum reception system and basic services, Russia’s ongoing war of aggression against Ukraine, and the security situation in the Middle East aggravated by terrorist groups; land borders with Slovakia and Czechia.

Advertisement

  • Denmark – 12/05/2025 – 11/11/2025 – Serious threats to public policy and internal security posed by possible sabotage actions from Russia, as well as continuous terrorism-related events and organised crime, notably, tied to the Israeli-Hamas conflict and driven by radicalisation from groups such as Islamic State and Al-Qaida. These threats include potential attacks on Jewish and Israeli targets; land and sea borders with Germany but may extend to all internal borders.

 

  • Norway – 12/05/2025 – 11/11/2025 – General threat aimed at the energy sector, threats of sabotage posed by the Russian intelligence service, as well as to increase infrastructure protection; ports with ferry connections to the Schengen area

 

  • Sweden – 12/05/2025 – 11/11/2025 – Serious threats to public policy and internal security arise from organised cross-border crime and terrorism, highlighted by attacks involving military-grade explosives against foreign institutions and the public, including the involvement of foreign state actors leveraging criminal gangs, coupled with persistent threats from violent Islamist groups and individuals; all internal borders (land, air, and sea) and land borders with Denmark.

Advertisement

  • France – 01/05/2025 – 31/10/2025 – Serious threats to public policy, public order, and internal security posed by persistent jihadist threats, a rise in antisemitic attacks, the growing criminal networks facilitating irregular migration and smuggling, and irregular migration flows towards the Franco-British border that risk infiltration by radicalised individuals, as well as the irregular crossings on the Channel and North Sea borders, along with rising violence among migrants, particularly in northern coastal areas such as Dunkirk and Calais, leading to tense and perilous situations for both migrants and law enforcement; all internal borders (land, air, and sea) with Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg, the Swiss Confederation, Spain, and Italy.

 

  • Germany – 16/03/2025 – 15/09/2025 – Serious threats to public security and order posed by continued high levels of irregular migration and migrant smuggling, and the strain on the asylum reception system. The impact of the global security situation (including Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and the situation in the Middle East) on security and migration; land borders with France, Luxembourg, Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark, Austria, Switzerland, Czechia, and Poland.

READ ALSO: How long can Germany keep its border checks in place?

Advertisement

  • Slovenia – 22/06/2025 – 21/12/2025 – Serious threats to public policy and internal security posed by a high level of terrorist threats and organised crime, including human smuggling and arms trafficking, the risk of terrorist infiltrations into migratory flows via the Western Balkans, hybrid threats from the Russian Federation and Belarus, as well as instability in the EU’s neighbourhood, including Russia’s ongoing aggression against Ukraine and instability following the fall of Assad’s regime in Syria; land borders with Croatia and Hungary.

 

  • The Netherlands – 09/06/2025 – 08/12/2025 – Serious threat to public policy caused by high levels of asylum applications, irregular migration, migrant smuggling, and secondary movements, leading to an overburdening of the migration system in general and the asylum system in particular, as well as pressure on public services, including housing, health care and education; land and air borders with Belgium and Germany.

 

  • Bulgaria – 01/01/2025 – 30/06/2025 – Security risks related to illegal migration, including smuggling activities, as well as migratory pressure caused by ongoing crises in the Middle East and Africa, particularly in Syria, Afghanistan, and Gaza/Lebanon; land borders with Romania.

 

  • Slovenia – 22/12/2024 – 21/06/2025 – Serious threats to public policy and internal security posed by continuous terrorism-related events and organised crime, including smuggling and arms trafficking, the risk of terrorist infiltrations into migratory flows via the Western Balkans, and radicalised Islamists potentially entering European cities during the holiday season, as well as hybrid threats from the Russian Federation, Russia’s ongoing aggression in Ukraine, Russian nationals attempting to illegally enter Slovenia; land borders with Croatia and Hungary.

Continue Reading

Business

Wie sich das Kräfteverhältnis in Nahost verändert

Published

on

By

Wie sich das Kräfteverhältnis in Nahost verändert

Israel warnt seit Jahren vor dem Atomprogramm des Irans und sieht sich dadurch in seiner Existenz bedroht. Doch auch die aktuelle militärische Eskalation birgt große Gefahren für die ganze Region – denn es drohen Vergeltungsschläge. Daher bemühen sich derzeit zahlreiche Staaten, darunter auch Deutschland, und Organisationen um Deeskalation.

Die weitere Schwächung des Mullah-Regimes könnte zu einem neuen Kräfteverhältnis im Nahen und Mittleren Osten führen – wenn der Iran erstmals seit fast fünfzig Jahren deutlich zurückgedrängt wird und sich neue Machtzentren entwickeln. Zur Erinnerung: Der Iran hat zu Zeiten der islamischen Revolution 1979 auf eine Verbreitung der eigenen Ideologie gesetzt. Über Proxys (Stellvertreter) wie schiitisch-islamische Milizen sollten Glaubensbrüder in den Ländern der arabischen Halbinsel dazu gebracht werden, die Revolution der Mullahs weiterzutragen.

Teheran hatte die Vernichtung Israels zur „heiligen Pflicht“ erklärt

Damals erklärte Teheran auch die Lösung der Palästinenserfrage – durch die Vernichtung Israels – zur heiligen Pflicht. Dabei ging es den schiitischen Machthabern insbesondere auch darum, den sunnitischen arabischen Herrscherhäusern, insbesondere Saudi-Arabien, die Rolle der Wächter der heiligen islamischen Stätten streitig zu machen. Es geht also um Mekka und Medina, aber auch um Jerusalem.

Die Hamas setzte auf die Unterstützung der Proxys des Irans, als die radikal-islamische Gruppe am 7. Oktober 2023 den Terrorangriff auf Israel verübte – und bekam Waffenhilfe von der libanesischen Hisbollah und den Huthi-Milizen im Jemen. Israel schlug massiv zurück: Hisbollah-Chef Hassan Nasrallah ist inzwischen tot. In Syrien kam es, auch wegen der Schwächung der Hisbollah, zum Sturz des mit Teheran verbündeten Assad-Regimes.

Schwierig ist die Lage derweil für den jordanischen König, der sich im Spagat üben muss. Weil er einerseits hilft, Israel bei iranischen Drohnenangriffen mit Abwehrraketen zu schützen, andererseits dadurch immer mehr Rückhalt in der eigenen Bevölkerung verliert. Auch Ägypten leidet: Ohnehin schon wirtschaftlich stark gebeutelt, fließt gerade wegen der Huthi-Angriffe auf Schiffe im Roten Meer deutlich weniger Geld aus einer der Haupteinkommensquellen, dem Suez-Kanal, in die Staatskasse.

Profitieren könnte Saudi-Arabien

Saudi-Arabien hat die aktuellen Angriffe Israels auf den Iran als Verletzung der Souveränität und der Sicherheit des Iran und als Bruch von internationalem Recht verurteilt. Dennoch könnte das ölreiche Land am Ende gestärkt aus der eskalierenden Lage hervorgehen. Dass Riad als politischer Akteur wichtiger geworden ist, war bereits durch den Besuch von US-Präsident Donald Trump in dem Königreich deutlich geworden.

„Es gibt eine neue Ordnung in der arabischen Welt. Und Saudi-Arabien ist das neue Gravitationszentrum“, sagte Philipp Dienstbier, Leiter des Regionalprogramms Golf-Staaten der Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, unserer Redaktion. „Auch Katar und die Vereinigten Arabischen Emirate sind deutlich wichtiger geworden.“

Mit Blick auf deutsche Vermittlungsbemühungen im Nahen und Mittleren Osten betonte er: „Deutschland sollte den Golfstaaten – anders als die ehemalige Bundesregierung – nicht mit erhobenem Zeigefinger, sondern pragmatisch und an unseren Interessen ausgerichtet gegenübertreten.“

Die Saudis fordern eine „glaubwürdige Perspektive“ für einen Palästinenser-Staat

Saudi-Arabien ist an einer Deeskalation in der Region interessiert und lehnt eine weitere direkte Konfrontation zwischen Israel und dem Iran daher ab. „Das Land will seine Wirtschaft transformieren und vom Erdöl wegkommen. Darauf liegt der Fokus“, erläuterte Philipp Dienstbier.

So arbeite Riad seit 2022 daran, alte Konflikte beizulegen: „Damals wurde der Waffenstillstand mit den Huthis vereinbart. Später gab es die von China vermittelte Annäherung an den Erzfeind Iran. Die Saudis setzen auf starke Staaten in der Region, die für Stabilität sorgen.“

Zu einer Neuordnung im Nahen und Mittleren Osten gehört auch eine Zukunftsperspektive für die Palästinenser, angefangen mit einem Waffenstillstand im Gazakrieg. „Für Saudi-Arabien ist für eine Normalisierung zwischen dem Königreich und Israel die Lösung der Palästinenserfrage der notwendige erste Schritt“, sagte Philipp Dienstbier. „Dazu gehört, wie es Riad formuliert, eine glaubwürdige und unumkehrbare Perspektive für einen palästinensischen Staat.“

Continue Reading

Business

Dating in Schweden: Hier machen oft Frauen den ersten Schritt

Published

on

By

Dating in Schweden: Hier machen oft Frauen den ersten Schritt

Sind Schweden wirklich kühl? Die Beziehungs-Expertin Emilie Ebbis Roslund über Flirtmethoden, feministische Männer und die schwedische Definition eines Dates.

In Israel suchen Singles jemanden, mit dem sie in den Bunker können, in Indien hilft die Kupplerin beim Dating. Wie sich Menschen kennenlernen, unterscheidet sich von Land zu Land. Der stern geht in der Serie “Das Lieben der Anderen” der Frage nach, auf welche Art Menschen in aller Welt ihr Herz vergeben. Und wie sich das zwischen Traditionen und Moderne verändert. In dieser ersten Folge führt der Dating-Atlas nach Schweden. 

Frau Roslund, wenn man in Schweden in eine Bar geht und jemanden kennenlernen will – wie stellt man das an? 

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Superkenntnis. Alle Rechte Vorbehalten.