Der VfK Weddinghofen hat das Duell gegen den 1.FC Pelkum verloren und steht nun schon mit einem Bein in der B-Liga. Schuld war vor allem die zweite Hälfte.

2 Min Lesezeit

Der VfK Weddinghofen taumelt nach einer katastrophalen zweiten Halbzeit dem Abstieg entgegen. Das Abstiegsduell gegen den 1. FC Pelkum ging schlussendlich deutlich verloren.

Kreisliga A1 Unna-Hamm
FC Pelkum – VfK Weddinghofen
3:0 (0:0)

„In der ersten Halbzeit haben wir den Kampf noch angenommen und aus meiner Sicht auf diesem katastrophalen Platz noch den besseren Fußball gespielt“, blickte VfK-Trainer Thomas Kramer zurück und stellt dann klar: „In der zweiten Halbzeit haben wir vor allem in den ersten 20 Minuten alles vermissen lassen.“

In der Tat war Weddinghofen zunächst das bessere Team im Duell der beiden Mannschaften, die die Abstiegsplätze belegen. Immer wieder kam der VfK druckvoll nach vorne und verzeichnete durch Daniel Paul und Til Wemmert die ersten Möglichkeiten. Nach einem Eckball wurde es dann unübersichtlich. Der FCP-Torhüter Steven Steinwachs unterlief den Ball und in Flippermanier ging der Ball auf das Tor. Weddinghofen jubelte, aber das Schiedsrichtergespann entschied auf weiterspielen. „Wir hatten diese Riesentorchance und da kann man auch auf Tor entscheiden“, ärgerte sich Kramer.

In der zweiten Halbzeit kam der VfK dann kaum noch aus der eigenen Hälfte heraus. Pelkum rannte mit Wucht an, scheiterte jedoch immer wieder an VfK-Keeper Erik Lenschmidt. Plötzlich stand Angelo Müller völlig frei und brachte Pelkum in Führung. Weddinghofen wirkte komplett geschockt und bekam direkt den zweiten Treffer eingeschenkt. David Zukowski hatte ebenfalls viel Platz und sorgte für die Vorentscheidung. In der Folge ergab der VfK sich streckenweise und so fiel auch folgerichtig das dritte Tor durch Thomas Wilczek.

„In der ersten Halbzeit haben wir schlecht gespielt und haben dann erfolgreich umgestellt“, freute sich FCP-Trainer Gregor Aniolczyk und blickt mit einem mulmigen Gefühl voraus: „Wir müssen unsere katastrophale Auswärtsbilanz verbessern. Es wird bis zum letzten Spieltag spannend bleiben.“

„Pelkum hat viel mehr verstanden, worum es geht“, bemängelte Kramer ein Stück weit die Einstellung mancher Spieler, möchte jedoch nicht aufgeben: „Neun Punkte sind zu vergeben und man kennt mich für meinen Optimismus. Dennoch planen wir natürlich in beide Richtungen.“

VfK: Lenschmidt – Paul, Kaya, Gomulka, Gökkaya (86. Senol), Becker, Karabacak, Cagli, Wemmert (57. Akbulut), Civak, ‚Derecik

Tore: 1:0 Müller (56.), 2:0 Zukowski (61.), 3:0 Wilczek (77.)

Zur Startseite

Mon 23rd Dec, 2024

The details surrounding the escape of former Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad to Moscow have emerged, revealing significant aspects of his departure and the situation of his family.

Following the ousting of Assad from power, reports have frequently surfaced regarding his hurried flight to Russia, facilitated by the Russian intelligence services. The Kremlin has confirmed his presence in the Russian capital, prompting further investigations that have unveiled additional information about the circumstances surrounding his exit.

According to recent findings, Assad left Damascus in an armored vehicle provided by Russian authorities, accompanied by his eldest son, Hafis. Upon his arrival in Moscow, it has been reported that his wife, Asma al-Assad, was already in the city, having been there for several weeks to undergo treatment for cancer.

Asma al-Assad’s presence in Moscow was reportedly due to her medical needs, as she had been receiving care while staying with her parents prior to her husband’s arrival. However, recent media reports from Turkish and Arab sources indicate that she has filed for divorce from Assad and is considering relocating to London. Furthermore, it has been suggested that she has applied to a court in Moscow for permission to leave the country, a request that is currently under review.

Asma, born in London in 1975, holds both British and Syrian citizenship. Before her marriage to Assad, she had worked in London and moved to Syria in 2000. The Financial Times has indicated that the couple’s other children have also arrived in Russia, with Asma seeking permission for their exit as well.

In a significant political move, Russian President Vladimir Putin has granted asylum to Assad and his family amidst the ongoing turmoil in Syria, where rebel forces have gained control over the capital. The exact location of the Assads in Moscow remains undisclosed. During a recent press conference, Putin stated his intention to meet with Assad, although no such meeting has occurred since the dictator’s arrival.

Previously, it was reported that Assad had initially hesitated to leave Syria. However, faced with the escalating crisis, he ultimately resolved to flee to Moscow. Throughout this period, he allegedly kept his close associates in the dark regarding his plans for escape.

This unfolding situation highlights not only the precariousness of Assad’s position but also the potential ramifications for his family as they navigate their new reality in Russia.

According to Deutsche Bahn, the number of train passengers between Berlin and Munich doubled to about 3.6 million per year after a high-speed rail line opened between the two cities in 2017, which translates to approximately 10,000 train passengers per day.

Industry figures suggest that rail travel accounts for roughly 40 percent of journeys between the two cities. Of the remainder, approximately 35 percent travel by air, 20 percent by car, and five percent by coach or bus.

Those are the options – but which is the best?

Below, we’ve set out the various pros and cons. The prices shown are for one-way journeys and are averages unless otherwise stated.

Bus companies, train operators, and airlines offer numerous deals for off-peak travel – and it always pays to book well in advance if you can. For train travellers, Deutsche Bahn’s Bahncard 25 is an affordable way to nab a 25 percent discount on rail fares. 

Train

Taking a train from Berlin to Munich (or vice versa) takes between just about 4 and 4.5 hours and can cost as little as €17 – if you don’t mind when you travel and are happy to book at least a fortnight advance. According to Omio, the average price of a one-way ticket is €113 (if you book on the day). There are approximately 20 trains running daily.

Travelling by train has a number of additional advantages, including city centre departure and arrival, freedom from security checks, and the smallest carbon footprint – roughly 22kg of CO2 – of all the available options. 

To book tickets, visit the Deutsche Bahn or FlixTrain websites.

READ ALSO: New Munich-Paris high speed rail service planned

Flying

As with trains, there are approximately 20 flights a day between Berlin and Munich, and the average fare is around €100 (although they can be much more if you book last minute).

The flight time is just under an hour, but both airports are some distance from the city centre. Once you take into account the amount of time it takes to travel to and from the airport(s), and the time spent clearing security and waiting for luggage, the average journey time tends to be around 5 hours.

Advertisement

As you might expect, this is the least environmentally way to travel: according to Atmosfair, a roundtrip from Berlin to Munich produces 300kg of CO2 per passenger. 

German airline Lufthansa runs nearly all direct flights between the two cities, so if you want to fly, you can book directly through them or a price comparison website.

READ ALSO: Munich, Vienna or Salzburg – Which is the best airport to fly from?

Bus

Travelling by bus is both the cheapest and the slowest method of making the journey. A ticket costs around €17, but the journey can take anywhere from 7 to 11 hours. The level of comfort tends to be slightly worse in comparison to a journey by train, and the carbon footprint slightly higher.

If you’re looking to save a few euros and have missed the boat on a low-cost train tickets, visit the FlixBus website to nab an affordable bus ticket.

A Flixbus stands in the Central Bus Station in Berlin. Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Fabian Sommer

Car

From an environmental point of view, there isn’t much difference between driving and flying between Berlin and Munich (assuming you’re alone in the car).

The distance between the two cities is just under 600 km and the journey generally takes somewhere between 5.5 and 6.5 hours, depending on traffic.

The cost in petrol is likely to be somewhere between €60 and €80. Parking in Berlin is relatively straightforward but can be far more of a problem in Munich.

READ ALSO: Why are fewer people taking domestic flights in Germany?

Rideshare

In comparison with other countries, Germany’s ridesharing (Mitfahgelegeneheit) infrastructure is reasonably well developed.

A less flexible, but far more social, alternative to driving, it’s also cheaper and greener. Platforms which specialise in putting people and cars together include: Blablacar, Mitfahren and Mifaz. Deals will vary, but generally you’ll simply pay a contribution to the petrol costs. 

Advertisement

Which is best?

If you value flexibility and privacy, you may want to drive – but trains remain the fastest, most convenient, and greenest option for most people travelling between Berlin and Munich.

As an alternative, ride-sharing is an excellent low-cost and climate-conscious alternative for those who have no problem sitting in a car with strangers.

Do you have any tips on the best way to travel between Berlin and the Bavarian capital? Let us know in the comments below or by dropping us an email at news@thelocal.com.